I was
interested in this study (below) only because I would love to blow it
out of the water! Just the title shows the bias. I would like to have
seen the questionnaires given to 9-12 year old never smokers. But, you have to pay! I bet the questionaires were suitably angled to achieve the correct answers - especially the ones on "
6%
of never-smoking children reported symptoms of
craving, 8% reported cue-triggered wanting to smoke, and 20% reported
subjective
symptoms in response to ETS exposure. In
never-smoking children, a higher number of smokers in the child’s social
environment
was associated with more symptoms of cue-triggered
wanting to smoke and more subjective symptoms in response to ETS."
Adults
can't specifically analyse a "craving" - what is a "craving"? How do
you ask about your "craving" without putting words in your mouth? Or drawing them out?
This study makes me well suspicious of the "science" here.
I grew up in a family where smoking, drinking and sex were frowned upon. My sister and I smoked all our lives.
A year ago I changed my brand to vaping, but my sister smokes still. So
we grew up in a home where no one smoked, no relatives smoked and no
friends of the family smoked. I was quite old before I saw anyone
smoking. But I did spend the weekend sometimes with my granny and
grandpa in their quarters at the YMCA and I loved the smell of cigarettes, pipes and cigars which I never saw being smoked as I was not allowed into any rooms besides their living quarters.
In comparison, all my five children grew up with both parents smoking, and in those days we smoked inside. I smoked and drank through every
pregnancy. All our children grew up healthy and well. Of five children,
only my son smokes - five home rollies a day and he is wracked with guilt about that. Such guilt is very unhealthy - more unhealthy than smoking!
So I don't know about this study below - sounds sort of Tobacco Control science to me. What do you think?
A recent line of studies has brought attention to the question whether
repeated exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)
is capable of producing psycho-physiological
effects in non-smokers and whether symptoms of nicotine dependence can
develop
in the absence of active smoking. Children seem to
be particularly vulnerable to the effects of ETS. We examined the
occurrence
of psycho-behavioural symptoms, designed to assess
nicotine addiction and nicotine withdrawal, in a sample of 778
never-smoking
children aged 9–12 years using cross-sectional
survey data collected in 15 Dutch primary schools. In the present study,
6%
of never-smoking children reported symptoms of
craving, 8% reported cue-triggered wanting to smoke, and 20% reported
subjective
symptoms in response to ETS exposure. In
never-smoking children, a higher number of smokers in the child’s social
environment
was associated with more symptoms of cue-triggered
wanting to smoke and more subjective symptoms in response to ETS.
Never-smoking
children and children who had initiated smoking
were equally likely to report subjective symptoms in response to ETS
exposure.
In conclusion, environmental smoking is associated
with self-reported psycho-behavioural symptoms in never-smoking
children.
Future research needs to investigate whether
symptoms in children exposed to ETS are physiologically based or whether
they
reflect other characteristics which predispose
youth for smoking initiation in the future.
What a total load of nonsense. My husband and I smoked for years until we took to vaping this year. I tried to cut down smoking when pregnant but still smoked a bit. Both the kids grew up with second hand smoke and neither of them smoke as adults, although they both admitted they had tried a cigarette when at school.
ReplyDelete